Reply
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Reply

Re: Frequently Asked Questions on TOS changes regarding information sharing and interviews

Highlighted
Moderator
Valeria K Moderator Member Since: Mar 6, 2014
111 of 787

Hi Wes,

 

It is available on mobile apps as long as you have the Dropbox App and are logged into it on your phone as well. Then you can click the paper clip button, then click Browse and click on the Dropbox icon. 

~ Valeria
Untitled
Highlighted
Community Guru
Wes C Member Since: May 3, 2019
112 of 787

Thank you, Valeria.

 

The concerns about the reliability and availability of the audio/video calls and the scheduling functionality remain. We need exceptions to use scheduling tools and for when calling isn't working, please.

Highlighted
Active Member
Anita N Member Since: Sep 27, 2017
113 of 787

Wes,

I think you are being too kind - We don't need exceptions for when calling isn't working. This would require us to waste time with a non-working call first, frustate the client, and only then be able to use some other means?

Upwork does not seem to understand that the freelancers on this site are, at their core, service providers. Service providers need to make sure that everything is as easy as possible for their clients. We should not have to jump through hoops just to make sure we have a trouble-free phone call!

 

Highlighted
Community Guru
Wes C Member Since: May 3, 2019
114 of 787

Anita N wrote:

Wes,

I think you are being too kind - We don't need exceptions for when calling isn't working. This would require us to waste time with a non-working call first, frustate the client, and only then be able to use some other means?

 

 


Anita, I understand what you're saying and agree. What I'm asking for with the exceptions is the same thing we have with the products we use today. Skype is having troubles? I'll spin up a Zoom or a Google Meet, or just share my cell. Today we have options.

 

I'm ok with using their calling functionality during an interview if it works (granted, I've seen no evidence so far that it does since we have no ability to test it without involving a client), but we need the option to fall back on something else. 

 

Without that option, the freelancer looks like an amateur who can't be bothered with setting up a professional set of tools to work with. It doesn't matter that it's not our choice - we're the face.

 

It's the same thing with scheduling tools like Calendly. Tools like that are part of the professional work environment now. If UW provides a functional tool for asynchronous calendar scheduling, I'm happy to use it. But it doesn't exist yet. Until then, we need to be able to use the tools that are available, or, again, we look like amateurs.

 

 

Highlighted
Active Member
Anita N Member Since: Sep 27, 2017
115 of 787
All I'm saying Wes is that we shouldn't have to rely on a fallback if or when something fails. We should be free to use any form of communication that is most comfortable for us and our clients.
As you correctly note, this just makes us look like amateurs, not professionals who are being treated like children since the forum we are relying on to do business doesn't trust us.
Also, if I were a client being told I can't speak on a regular phone until I actually hire, I frankly would look elsewhere.
Highlighted
Ace Contributor
Dana K D Member Since: Aug 16, 2018
116 of 787

Anita, you have 100% summed this up in a neat little nutshell.  What other business entity in the free world dictates that people cannot use the most common and universally available communication tool (a telephone) to determine whether or not they wish to exchange $$$ for goods and services?

Highlighted
Community Guru
Pandora H Member Since: May 11, 2010
117 of 787

Because that would be just a mite unpopular, eh? Seriously though, this is not going to block scammers at all. Or at least, not in the numbers the site actually NEEDS.

 

They will get rid of a few bad actors intially, and while we are all bending over backwards to comply, the bad actors will be doing business as normal.

 

Which is why I say, and am not the only one, there is more to it than that, and not knowing why makes it really hard to argue against.

Highlighted
Active Member
Anita N Member Since: Sep 27, 2017
118 of 787

Thank you Dana! Well put!

Highlighted
Community Guru
David S M Member Since: Apr 24, 2018
119 of 787

Not really liking this new rule about communicating with clients only on Upwork prior to a contract.  Many clients want to have a verbal conversation prior to hiring, and Upwork's call feature is in need of some serious work for it to be adequate in 2020! I understand why Upwork is making these changes, and I really hope it helps keep work on the site with other freelancers who take work off site prior to a contract, or agree to take work off the site, but if you want us to all use your communication tools, then please fix them. 

 

 

Highlighted
Community Guru
Jennifer M Member Since: May 17, 2015
120 of 787

David S M wrote:

Not really liking this new rule about communicating with clients only on Upwork prior to a contract.  Many clients want to have a verbal conversation prior to hiring, and Upwork's call feature is in need of some serious work for it to be adequate in 2020! I understand why Upwork is making these changes, and I really hope it helps keep work on the site with other freelancers who take work off site prior to a contract, or agree to take work off the site, but if you want us to all use your communication tools, then please fix them. 

 

 


I'm giving out my info like a mad lad right now before the rule goes into effect. Just sold another contract after chatting in Slack. This new rule is dumb and they've managed to kill their revenue makers while the people who take things off platform will just get clients in voice and trade info and keep going. I have to keep my rage on reddit though and on Friday I'm gonna laugh so hard at the drama.

TOP KUDOED MEMBERS