During a job search I found a post offering 5 star rating as part of the reward/payment for the project:
"I will leave a lot of 5* reviews so that you will be able to get jobs easier in the future and this is a long-term position. Once we have done the first batch of 10 we could continue if everything looks good."
Not sure if it against Upwork ToS, but it looks very unprofessional. I've flagged the job post would like to see further action taken.
Solved! Go to Solution.
And another one, requesting work before aproving a proposal.
"I need your advise on where to put the logo. it is in there currently twice. the vertical one is the correct one to use.
how else would you redesign it? using what we have to look better. please send pics of what you suggest"
Again, It would be great to talk to a moderator to act on these posts.
Generally, it's not against the ToS for a client to note that they often give 5-star feedback on their contracts. You can also check that information in their Work History.
That's not the message as I read it on the post. The client is stating that will give 5 star rating as part of the project.
I can accept it's not against Upwork rules, but it's certainly unethical.
Feedback manipulation is both unprofessional and a violation of Upwork ToS.
I'm not going to comment on whether this particular job posting violates ToS. (I have not seen the posting.)
But as a freelancer, I would not bid on the job of any client who so openly telegraphs her intention to manipulate me and manipulate Upwork using feedback in a "weaponized" way.
I'm more interested in clients who:
- hire me to do a job
- pay me money when the job is done
Let's be more specific than to say that clients are allowed to note that they "often" give five-star feedback.
Freelancers in these forums (self included) have previously made a fuss about jobs postings in which clients have specifically offered to give five-star feedback, not merely noted that they often do so. In fact, we have expressed great consternation at job postings in which clients have EXPLICITLY offered to give five-star feedback IN PLACE of, or at least in partial recompense for, cash compensation.
Our consternation has been met with the official word that such conduct by clients is acceptable and does not constitute "feedback manipulation," because it (a) is offered by a client and not by a freelancer, and (b) is offered prior to a contract being established and work being completed.
My own consternation remains, but I have grudgingly accepted the official policy. Let us not, however, sugar-coat or soft-pedal the limits of what is allowed to go on.
Back to this again:
New job post requesting Free Work: "I am willing to pay good money for the right logo, but we are only paying, if we use your logo. And I do not seek applicants, I seek suggestions for a logo. Think of this job ad as a logo competition."
"PLEASE DO NOT SEND APPLICATIONS WITHOUT ATTACHING A SUGGESTION OF A NEW LOGO TO CODE RESOURCING."
How can this be not considered as spec work?
Fellow freelancers, value your time and work!!
Learn more about our awesome Community member Lisa!Learn More
Virtual Talent Bench enables you to easily discover and connect with talent. Learn more about building custom lists of talent, adding tags, notes, and more to move your business forward.Learn More
Loom addition in messages provides more ways to easily communicate and share information on Upwork!Learn More
Beginning Your Freelancing Journey on UpworkLearn More