Tara Y wrote:
Hi All:
I'm working with a client on a grant application. This is my third contract with her and we've worked together well (though she's requested a couple of phone calls for clarification on projects, for which I essentially don't get paid because I work with her on a lump sum basis). A few days ago she shared the document I had written with an "advisor" she works with, who has expertise on a slightly different aspect of the topic than I do; the advisor is now making edits and comments in the document, some of which I agree with and some of which I don't. I just wrote a polite email to the client asking her to accept/not accept the advisor's comments so I know what edits to make--making it clear that I am responding to the client's wishes and not the advisor's, unless they align.
Essentially this advisor's input makes me uncomfortable--she's not the client; she does certainly have some expertise, but I've actually worked in the field longer than she has; her comments to me have a slightly edgy rather than collaborative tone {she told the client that she "hated" another piece I had written with/for the client); and I just don't want to have a situation where there are too many cooks in the kitchen. Is this a reasonable reaction or am I being turf-y? I am considering telling the client after this project ends that I won't work with the advisor, but as the client is one of my few regular clients at the moment, I don't know if that's a bad idea.
Thanks for your insight!
I think your expectations may not align with the expectations of this particular client. I have found that the job of a freelancer often involves more than just delivering a final product, you are also responsible for managing the scope of the project and providing customer service.
Most clients expect you to include anything related to the project in your fixed price. So, if they need to discuss the project or ask for revisions, those tasks are all included (within reason). Set your terms at the outset with regard to communication and revisions.
With regard to the advisor, you are being turfy. It is the client's project. They can hire whomever they want to work on it. If you disagree with a suggestion, state your disagreement and make sure the client is "on record" acknowledging receipt of your advice. (I jokingly tell one of my clients that he is acting AWA-against writer's advice).
I understand the impulse to want to limit input from third-parties. I don't think many writers enjoy having someone look over their shoulder. And, it is possible for you to screen your clients to ensure that you only work with those who will defer solely to you as the expert. But, if you haven't insisted pre-contract that you and only you will manage a project, then the client should be free to bring in other consultants.
